Press Release
ORTHODONTICS AND FACIAL APPEARANCE.

ORTHOTROPICS ‘MUCH THE BEST’
Recent research shows that the public think that Orthotropics without extractions or ‘Train Tracks’ provides much the best results when compared with a range of orthodontic methods. Orthodontists also consider them better but not to such a great extent. This ‘blind’ study was presented at the European Orthodontic Conference in Vienna in June 2006 by Drs John and Michael Mew. It was pointed out however that these results are dependent on the patients being treated while young and it requires high levels of co-operation.

Natural Methods may be More Effective than Extractions or Train Tracks.

Research on identical twins, published in the World Journal of Orthodontics today, suggests that traditional methods of straightening teeth may not be as effective as some natural methods. “Orthodontic treatment is usually delayed until after growth has stopped” explains Professor John Mew director of the London School of Facial Orthotropics, “by when it may be too late to avoid extractions and ‘Train Tracks”. This research suggests that extractions may be avoided if the growth of the jaws can be corrected, preferably before the age of eight”. Correcting the shape and size of the jaws also improves the appearance of the face.

This research project applied different types of treatment to identical twins and found that after Orthotropics (growth guidance) the facial appearance improved and the teeth stayed straight for longer. Traditional orthodontic methods appeared to cause some damage to the face and the teeth were more likely to re-crowd afterwards.

Abstract. Despite the known influence of orthodontic treatment on facial appearance there have been few comparative studies of the effect of different treatments, and none of these appear to have looked at the long-term consequences. Material. This study compared the effect of Traditional fixed appliances against Orthotropic (growth guidance) treatment without fixed appliances, on a series of twelve identical twins, ten years after treatment. Facial changes were assessed by a panel of ten lay judges. A comparison was also made of the dental changes and an error study undertaken. Results. Most of the Traditionally Treated twins were judged to look less attractive after treatment while most treated by Orthotropics were judged to have improved. There was little difference in the dental results but the traditionally treated cases seemed to relapse to a greater extent after treatment.

Contact:  John Mew, Clinical Director the London School of Facial Orthotropics, Purley Courtyard Clinic, London. CR8 2NE. England. 0044+(0)1435-862045 or john.mew@virgin.net)

Embargoed until the 30th  May. Copyright The World Journal of Orthodontics, Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 4350 Chandler Drive, Hanover Park, Illinois, 60133. USA.